> > Another question: do I undestand correctly that the lateral > > cache lacks > > the invalidate-message sending of the centralized remote cache? > > My impression is the idea of lateral cache is fundamentally flawed. So I > just igore it.
Can you back that up? I like the lateral cache, it makes a lot of sense to me -- especially built on top of a reliable multicast messaging system. All peers share elements as they are added to / removed from the cache. For more consistency, a member can broadcast a get request to its peers just in case it never received the broadcast (if it was rebooted perhaps). -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
