Exactly! I'm also opposed to such a switch. _If_ we were to do something like this I would want a 'build-without-tests' target that does the build without running the unit tests. This makes it clear to the developer that they are not testing, less potential for confusion.
-- jt On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 07:35, Brekke, Jeff wrote: > Perfect, hardly. In fact it is since I'm so im-perfect that I like to have > the build failing when a unit test fails. You can still commit code and > continue to develop with your failing test in Maven today. My fear with the > switch is developers will turn it on and unknowningly commit code that > fails. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
