I have fixed the two technical issues here (the location of the
parent pom and the type of the composite) and uploaded a new copy of
the files for core-samples.
--
Jeremy
On Mar 8, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
-0 from me.
I tried the release and ran into several issues with the assembly
distribution and the samples:
- assembly-2.0-alpha-incubating-bin.tar.gz should unpack in an
asssembly-x.0-alpha-incubating directory instead of the current
directory
- The tuscany Jars are missing a tuscany-prefix
- Broken links in the core-samples/readme.html
- The samples failed to build until I went and built the java/pom/
sca Maven module from the release tag. The pom for that sca module
should part of the release and published in a Maven repos.
- The webapp sample fails to build with the following error:
[INFO]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
[INFO] Failed to resolve artifact.
Missing:
----------
1) org.apache.tuscany.sca.core-samples.common:calculator:jar:2.0-
alpha-incubating
Try downloading the file manually from the project website.
Then, install it using the command:
mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.apache.tuscany.sca.core-
samples.common -DartifactId=calculator \
-Dversion=2.0-alpha-incubating -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/
path/to/file
Path to dependency:
1) org.apache.tuscany.sca.core-samples.webapp:webcalc:war:
2.0-alpha-incubating
2) org.apache.tuscany.sca.core-samples.common:calculator:jar:
2.0-alpha-incubating
----------
1 required artifact is missing.
for artifact:
org.apache.tuscany.sca.core-samples.webapp:webcalc:war:2.0-alpha-
incubating
I think that it's because webcalc/pom.xml is missing a
<type>composite</type> statement.
I also have two concerns:
- I am concerned that this release requires Maven expertise to
build the samples (we had an alternative with Ant in M1, and IMO we
should have had one in M2 as well).
- Also I find the release name 2.0-alpha confusing. After 1.0-M1
and 1.0-M2 I would expect a 1.0-alpha instead of a 2.0-alpha.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
