On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:47 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Mike Edwards wrote: > > > > > >> Simon Laws wrote: > > >> > > >>> It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then > > >>> there > > >>> has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels > > like > > >>> the > > >>> right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list over > the > > >>> last > > >>> couple of months there are quite a few candidates for inclusion that > I > > >>> can > > >>> see; > > >>> > > >>> Better BPEL support > > >>> Improvements to the domain manager app > > >>> Improved runtime Java2WSDL processing > > >>> Support for validation monitoring > > >>> Databinding improvements > > >>> Performance improvements > > >>> JSR250 annotation support > > >>> OSGi support improvements and a simple OSGi runtime test > > >>> Java 2 security enablement > > >>> Quite a few more tests for various parts of the runtime > > >>> Lots of JIRA fixes. > > >>> and of course we can remove the "incubating" assignment and drum up a > > bit > > >>> of > > >>> publicity for our TLP graduation > > >>> > > >>> I'd also like to have a bit of a tidy up for this release and remove > > the > > >>> old > > >>> domain modules we are no longer using (I'll post on this separately) > > >>> > > >>> What else has been added or changed? > > >>> > > >>> I think the things I would like to get done can be closed off next > week > > >>> ready to cut a branch. > > >>> > > >>> Thoughts? > > >>> > > >>> Simon > > >>> > > >>> Yes, I give a +1. > > >> > > >> BPEL is looking a lot better now. I'd like to add a couple of more > > >> sophisticated itests/samples as well and the release will be a good > > spur. > > >> > > >> > > >> Yours, Mike. > > >> > > >> I think this is a good time to do a 1.3 release. This would make > > > the new runtime Java2WSDL generation available to Tuscany users, > > > and resolve a number of issues with the previous code generation > > > that used Axis2. The other improvements listed are valuable as well. > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > OK, so it looks like people want to do this > > > > Re. Luciano's question about RM. I'll volunteer to be RM this time round > > and > > all help is greatly appreciated. If though Luciano (or anyone else for > that > > matter) you are keen to RM this time then I won't fight you for it;-) > Would > > seem a little unfair though as you did the last one. > > > > Anyone have things they are working one that would stop us moving forward > > with this and cutting the R1.3 branch at the end of this week? > > > > Regards > > > > Simon > > > > +1 to Simon as RM and taking the branch at the end of this week. > > ...ant We'll I'm not hearing any comments against. I'll probably take the branch at the weekend when things are a little quieter. I've still got changes I want to make in trunk before then which are taking longer than I had hoped. So if everyone could get all the changes they want to make done by close of play Friday and ensure that we're getting a clean build then that will be a good base to take the branch from. Any problems let me know. Simon
