>From what you mentioned, I'm very interested in the web 2.0 integration, and the ability to mashup SCA components/services using simple SCA References concept on a web 2.0 client application.
I think that we should also add Data Integration to our Roadmap, as I see SCA of great help to simplify exposing data as services to a client application in a simple and flexible way. As for Core capabilities, I think we should improve the error reporting/handling for our data binding framework. On 10/10/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > We've released v1.0 of Tuscany SCA 2 weeks ago... So it's probably the > right time now to ask what people want to do next and try to build a > roadmap for the next few releases. > > Here are a few random thoughts to initiate the discussion. I've just > listed the things that came to my mind this morning, but I'm sure that > there's much much more to add :) > > - Support for transaction and reliability policies > Several users have asked for it, and there's now a public draft of the > transaction policy spec > > - Webapp and EJB module integration > I'd like to track the OASIS work on this and implement it in parallel in > Tuscany. Many users have existing J2EE EJB and EAR modules that they'll > need to integrate in bigger SCA compositions. Also Webapp developers > will need a non-intrusive way to wire a Webapp with other SCA components > in an SCA domain. > > - Conversational and non blocking + callback programming model over > Web2.0 bindings > Seems like a good fit with JSON for example... in particular Ajax > interactions fit really well with the SCA non blocking + callback > programming model. > > - Ability to model client side JavaScript components > Looking at the Store sample for example, I'd like to be able to model > the client Javascript as a component with SCA references to the > ShoppingCart and Catalog services, instead of manually creating JSON and > Atom client proxies in the client Javascript code. > > - Support for Atom using Apache Abdera > Abdera just released their 0.3.0, I've started to look at it and it > looks pretty good. I think we should try to port our Atom/RSS binding to > it and see how it compares with the Rome library which we are currently > using. > > - More modular distributions, in addition to our current all-in-one > distribution, distribute smaller packages that people can choose to > install or not? > > - Some clean up of the core runtime invocation and injection mechanism, > we can probably simplify and actually remove code in a number of places :) > > Could people please jump in and say what they want to see in the next > few releases? What they need for their Tuscany based projects? What is > missing? What needs to be improved or fixed? > > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
