Roshan, The SDO packages required to create SDO instances from OSGi bundles are now exported by the system bundle of the embedded Felix runtime started by Tuscany. The changes have been committed under revision 646679. You should now be able to import these packages in your bundles without installing additional SDO bundles.
On 4/9/08, roshan joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Rajani, > I have made the classes which I am using as a seperate bundle, bu the > problem now is with the tuscany sdo jars, which is a dependency for my > current sdo bundle. How do I get my import package resolved with the library > jars of tuscany sdo's. Has anyone tried them and run as bundles. > > I tried with some, but the dependency resolution for these jars are keep > on expanding exponentially. Any kind of advice is really helpful. > > Thank you for your suggestions. > > Regards > Roshan > > > > > > > > > > > > Roshan, > > The classes corresponding to the SDO datatype should be imported by (or > contained in) the bundle implementing the OSGi service. And if you are > using > the default SCA binding, the Java service and the OSGi service should be > using the same classes for the SDO datatypes. Which means that the Java > service should be defined inside a bundle contribution (a jar file > containing OSGi manifest headers). Does this help? > > > On 3/27/08, roshan joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > I am trying to work on a prototype to use osgi service with a java sca > > service using SDO datatypes. I had no problem with the datatypes like > > String, but when I changed the dataype to SDO based it does not work, as > the > > bundle cannot understand the SDO data, which is passed as arguments for > osgi > > service call. Can someone suggest what am I missing here? > > > > If anyone has encountered or tried this, please comment on the > experience. > > > > Thanks for any info in advance.. > > > > Regards > > Roshan > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- Thank you... Regards, Rajini
