Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>>>  
>>> -SRCS       := $(SOBJS:.o=.S) $(COBJS:.o=.c)
>>> -OBJS       := $(addprefix $(obj),$(SOBJS) $(COBJS))
>>> +SRCS       := $(SOBJS:.o=.S) $(COBJS:.o=.c) $(COBJS-y:.o=.c)
>>> +OBJS       := $(addprefix $(obj),$(SOBJS) $(COBJS) $(COBJS-y))
>>>  
>>>  all:       $(obj).depend $(LIB)
>>>  
>>> diff --git a/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ks8721.c 
>>> b/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ks8721.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..703e58c
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ks8721.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * (C) Copyright 2006
>>> + * Author : Eric Benard (Eukrea Electromatique)
>>> + * based on dm9161.c which is :
>>> + * (C) Copyright 2003
>>> + * Author : Hamid Ikdoumi (Atmel)
>>>       
>> I'm not a fan of this implementation at all
>>
>> but as I've not yet finish the rm9200 cleanup
>> I'll ack this ben what do you think?
>> ben please note that the rm9200 cleanup will introduce a phylib support
>>     
> Ben ping
>
> Best Regards,
> J.
>   
This patch has many coding style violations that haven't been addressed, 
so it can't go in.  I"m not a fan of the piece-meal PHY implementation 
either, but realize that a real PHY lib isn't imminent, unless your 
rm2000 implementation is useful across architectures.

regards,
Ben
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to