On 00:41 Fri 24 Jul , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, > > In message <20090723222713.gc24...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > > > > --- a/Makefile > > > +++ b/Makefile > > > @@ -2683,6 +2683,18 @@ at91rm9200ek_config : unconfig > > > cmc_pu2_config : unconfig > > > @$(MKCONFIG) $(@:_config=) arm arm920t cmc_pu2 NULL at91rm9200 > > > > > > +cpuat91_ram_config \ > > > +cpuat91_config : unconfig > > > + @mkdir -p $(obj)include > > > + @if [ "$(findstring _ram_,$@)" ] ; then \ > > > + echo "#define CONFIG_CPUAT91_RAM 1" >>$(obj)include/config.h ; \ > > same as other patch > > no need please define the > > #define CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT > > #define CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT > > here > > No. Not here, i. e. not in the Makefile. We don't want tens of lines > of scripts per board in the top level Makefile. I still do not want to see a new board specific config for this specially when we do have already config for this
Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot