Hi, On Thu Apr 25, 2024 at 8:19 AM CEST, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > I've cc'ed all the people I could find in board specific MAINTAINER files. > Can you respond to Richard with the proper company name & board name > so we can bind the following GUIDs to a vendor properly? > Richard any guidance on how this should be done properly is > appreciated, since I am not too aware of LVFS internals.
Thanks for taking care! > Kontron KONTRON_PITX_IMX8M_FIT_IMAGE_GUID c898e959-5b1f-4e6d-88e0-40d45cca1399 This (board) should likely be dropped to lower maintenance burden as it is EOL and "not recommended for new designs". > Kontron KONTRON_SL_MX8MM_FIT_IMAGE_GUID d488e45a-4929-4b55-8c14-86cea2cd6629 This is probably (at least) the wrong name. SL is a System-on-Module, a small PCB that will be soldered on a carrier board and cannot run on it's own and a customer using that SoM will likely have their own bootloader. There is, though the "BL" which is the in-house board for this SoM. Company name is "Kontron Electronics GmbH". > Kontron KONTRON_SL28_FIT_IMAGE_GUID 86ebd44f-feb8-466f-8bb8-890618456d8b Company name is "Kontron Europe GmbH". Both entities belong to the Kontron Group, not sure how this is handled in LVFS though. -michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
