On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:17 AM, David Schlesinger<david.schlesin...@access-company.com> wrote: >> Basically, it just needs the same love as Mono. > > One thing I think I can state with certainty about free and open source > software development is that demanding that a bunch of other folks drop what > they're doing and "give love" to something else on your behalf never works. > Maybe your time, and Mark's, would be better spent writing a credible F-Spot > replacement if you think that's something that needs to be done; certainly > don't expect anyone else to do it because F-Spot happens to upset you. > >
And see what I wrote half a day ago: On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Remco<remc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Mark Fink<mpf...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I see you are shooting the messenger, steve. >> >> the MONO camp has infiltrated canonical and now they are going around >> censoring anything that proves MONO to be the poison that it is. this >> is not a laughing matter and the fact that you slandering roy >> schestowitz only goes to show you are probably part of the problem. > > These accusations are not helping your case. If you want to really > solve the problem you need to: > > * improve the Gnome-Java bindings and get them in Ubuntu > * make a Java equivalent of F-Spot and Tomboy > * push for replacement of these apps and the framework > > I'm all for replacing Mono with Java, but the problems need to be > fixed. Complaining is not going to do that. > > Remco > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
