On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:23:47PM -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 05:49:50PM +0000, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > > > > [Kiko, Salgado, we are talking about the case of ubuntu-dev which used > > to have a lot of direct members but now will have just ubuntu-motu and > > ubuntu-core-dev, and whether or not we should remove all the direct > > members or just let them expire] > > > > In this specific case the expiration warning (even if it does contain a note > saying the person will still be an indirect member) will be useless (IMHO), > since they won't do anything about the soon-to-expire membership, so I think > it'd be better to remove the direct members rather then waiting for them to > expire.
Yes, in this case (since the change is due to a restructuring of the teams), I think we should deactivate the members rather than letting them expire. I've confirmed that the memberships are equivalent, though I didn't check all of the expiration dates. Is it possible to do this check (and any necessary corrections) programmatically before we deactivate anyone? -- - mdz -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu