On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Michael Schnell <mschn...@lumino.de> wrote: > On 08/03/2012 03:34 PM, Luis Alves wrote: >> >> Since the volatile tells exactly that you want to use registers during >> the manipulation of those variables, so I'm not surprised that it >> doesn't change memory contents directly. >> > Ooops. > > AFAIK, "volatile" means something like: > "this memory location is monitored or modified by another thread or by > hardware and thus any write and read needs to be done just as the c code > denotes and no read or write access is allowed to be be optimized away". >
Sorry, you are right... I made some confusion with that. > But maybe I am wrong here and in fact the idiot is myself and not the > compiler :-[ . > > I'll check this out with my compiler version. > > Thanks a lot ! > > -Michael > _______________________________________________ > uClinux-dev mailing list > uClinux-dev@uclinux.org > http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev > This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org > To unsubscribe see: > http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
