Hi,
IMHO it doesnt matter if you use mkpart or mkpartfs. The NTLDR error
comes from the wrong dedection/interpretation of the heads of the hard
disk. It is strange if mkpart has an other behavior than mkpartfs in
this case. So maybe you can send me the first 12 sektors from your fat
partition. On time created with mkpart and one time with mkpartfs (on an
affected comput), so I can take a look if there are some diffs.

greetz

Am Mittwoch, den 22.08.2007, 10:18 +0200 schrieb Juan Jose Pablos: 
> Mario Gzuk escribió:
> > Hi Juan!
> > can you explain what you mean?
> > I cant find any hint on this side, maybe can you point me in the right
> > direction? 
> > 
> 
> sure,
> first, I am not 100% that this will fix the issue, I am been touching so 
> many things in the last 24 hours, that maybe this is just a fuss :-)
> 
> 
> Apparently on dosbin/install.pl there is a line that calls parted to 
> create a partition:
> 
>   $ret = "$parted mkpart $parttype $fs $start $end";
> 
> looking on the command line options, I notice that there is a mkpartfs 
> with the same parameters so my guess was that maybe in the 1.6.23 those 
> changed and maybe we should be using the mkpartfs option  instead of mkpart
> 
> I did a quick test, and apparently that worked.
> 
> After sending that mail I notice some inconsistencies and I am not able 
> to reproduce anymore so I decide to run a "make tidy"  and rebuild the 
> whole environment. As soon as I am able to reproduce, I will let you know.
> 
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
unattended-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel

Reply via email to