Peter Kirk wrote on 07/08/2003 04:23:59 AM: > Would it work to define a new character, for example, for patah-hiriq > which has a canonical decomposition into patah plus hiriq, or even into > hiriq plus patah?
No, because any Unicode normalization form would decompose this, and then apply canonical reordering, thereby obviating the entire purpose for adding the digraph character. - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485
