Ted Hopp wrote: > When I first > saw it, I had assumed that FB4B was supposed to be used for > kholam male (and that's what we use it for in our code).
FB4B;HEBREW LETTER VAV WITH HOLAM;Lo;0;R;05D5 05B9;;;;N;;;;;
FB4B is *canonically* equivalent to <05D5, 05B9>, so you cannot
expect a distinction to be made when all involved characters are
supported. Indeed, FB4B will be normalised to <05D5, 05B9>
in all Unicode normal forms, since FB4B is composition excluded.
/kent k
