On Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:39 PM, Kent Karlsson wrote: > Ted Hopp wrote: > > When I first > > saw it, I had assumed that FB4B was supposed to be used for > > kholam male (and that's what we use it for in our code). > > FB4B;HEBREW LETTER VAV WITH HOLAM;Lo;0;R;05D5 05B9;;;;N;;;;; > > FB4B is *canonically* equivalent to <05D5, 05B9>, so you cannot > expect a distinction to be made when all involved characters are > supported. Indeed, FB4B will be normalised to <05D5, 05B9> > in all Unicode normal forms, since FB4B is composition excluded.
Yes, we were aware of that. We use FB4B strictly internally and never in a string that might get normalized. I think of it as a kind of markup code for us. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/
