I liked the Go implementation of character type - a rune type - which is a codepoint. and strings that return runes from by index. https://blog.golang.org/strings
Doesn't solve the problem for composited codepoints though... texel looks to be defined as a graphic element already. TEXture ELement. On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Janusz S. Bien <jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl> wrote: > Quote/Cytat - Asmus Freytag <asm...@ix.netcom.com> (Mon 13 Mar 2017 > 06:00:08 PM CET): > > [...] > > This (or similar) scenarios indicate the impossibility to come to a > single, universal definition of a "textel" -- the main reason why this > term is of lower utility than "pixel". > > I agree that it is impossible to come to a single, universal definition > of text elements, but it seems possible to reach a consensus on a kind of > the least common denominator of them and call it "textel" or something else. > > > Best regards > > Janusz > > -- > Prof. dr hab. Janusz S. Bień - Uniwersytet Warszawski (Katedra > Lingwistyki Formalnej) > Prof. Janusz S. Bień - University of Warsaw (Formal Linguistics Department) > jsb...@uw.edu.pl, jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl, http://fleksem.klf.uw.edu.pl/~ > jsbien/ > >
