On Thu, Nov 01 2018 at 13:34 -0700, Asmus Freytag via Unicode wrote: > On 11/1/2018 10:23 AM, Janusz S. Bień via Unicode wrote:
[...] > Looks like you completely missed my point. Nobody ever claimed that > reproducing all variations in manuscripts is in scope of Unicode, so > whom do you want to convince that it is not? > > Looks like you are missing my point about there being a continuum with > not clear lines that can be perfectly drawn a-priori. Why do you think so? There is nothing in my posts which can be used to support your claim. Perhaps you confused me with some other poster? Best regards Janusz -- , Janusz S. Bien emeryt (emeritus) https://sites.google.com/view/jsbien