Benjamin Roth: How do you know Arc eliminates GC pauses completely? By completely I mean no GC pauses whatsoever.
When you say Java is NOT the First choice for Server Applications you are generalizing it too much I would say since many of them fall under that category. Either way the statement you made is purely subjective. On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Benjamin Roth <benjamin.r...@jaumo.com> wrote: > Lol. The counter proof is to use another memory Model like Arc. Thats why > i personally think Java is NOT the First choice for Server Applications. > But thats a philosophic discussion. > > Am 25.11.2016 23:38 schrieb "Kant Kodali" <k...@peernova.com>: > >> +1 Chris Lohfink response >> >> I would also restate the following sentence "java GC pauses are pretty >> much a fact of life" to "Any GC based system pauses are pretty much a >> fact of life". >> >> I would be more than happy to see if someone can counter prove. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Chris Lohfink <clohfin...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> No tuning will eliminate gcs. >>> >>> 20-30 seconds is horrific and out of the ordinary. Most likely >>> implementing antipatterns and/or poorly configured. Sub 1s is realistic but >>> with some workloads still may require some tuning to maintain. Some >>> workloads are very unfriendly to GCs though (ie heavy tombstones, very wide >>> partitions). >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:25 PM, S Ahmed <sahmed1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello! >>>> >>>> From what I understand java GC pauses are pretty much a fact of life, >>>> but you can tune the jvm to reduce the likelihood of the frequency and >>>> length of GC pauses. >>>> >>>> When using Cassandra, how frequent or long have these pauses known to >>>> be? Even with tuning, is it safe to assume they cannot be eliminated? >>>> >>>> Would a 20-30 second pause be something out of the ordinary? >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>> >>> >>
