Good to know about Zing! I will have to take a look.

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Kant Kodali <k...@peernova.com> wrote:

> Benjamin Roth: How do you know Arc eliminates GC pauses completely? By
> completely I mean no GC pauses whatsoever.
>
> When you say Java is NOT the First choice for Server Applications you are
> generalizing it too much I would say since many of them fall under that
> category. Either way the statement you made is purely subjective.
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Benjamin Roth <benjamin.r...@jaumo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Lol. The counter proof is to use another memory Model like Arc. Thats why
>> i personally think Java is NOT the First choice for Server Applications.
>> But thats a philosophic discussion.
>>
>> Am 25.11.2016 23:38 schrieb "Kant Kodali" <k...@peernova.com>:
>>
>>> +1 Chris Lohfink response
>>>
>>> I would also restate the following sentence "java GC pauses are pretty
>>> much a fact of life" to "Any GC based system pauses are pretty much a
>>> fact of life".
>>>
>>> I would be more than happy to see if someone can counter prove.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Chris Lohfink <clohfin...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> No tuning will eliminate gcs.
>>>>
>>>> 20-30 seconds is horrific and out of the ordinary. Most likely
>>>> implementing antipatterns and/or poorly configured. Sub 1s is realistic but
>>>> with some workloads still may require some tuning to maintain. Some
>>>> workloads are very unfriendly to GCs though (ie heavy tombstones, very wide
>>>> partitions).
>>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:25 PM, S Ahmed <sahmed1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>
>>>>> From what I understand java GC pauses are pretty much a fact of life,
>>>>> but you can tune the jvm to reduce the likelihood of the frequency and
>>>>> length of GC pauses.
>>>>>
>>>>> When using Cassandra, how frequent or long have these pauses known to
>>>>> be?  Even with tuning, is it safe to assume they cannot be eliminated?
>>>>>
>>>>> Would a 20-30 second pause be something out of the ordinary?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to