Hi Branislav,

What is your column family definition?


Thanks & Regards,
Abhishek Kumar Maheshwari
+91- 9999805591 (Mobile)
Times Internet Ltd. | A Times of India Group Company
FC - 6, Sector 16A, Film City,  Noida,  U.P. 201301 | INDIA
P Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. Spread 
environmental awareness.

From: Branislav Janosik -T (bjanosik - AAP3 INC at Cisco) 
[mailto:bjano...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 6:18 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cassandra cluster performance

Hi,

- Consistency level is set to ONE
-  Keyspace definition:

                    "CREATE KEYSPACE  IF NOT EXISTS  onem2m " +
        "WITH replication = " +
        "{ 'class' : 'SimpleStrategy', 'replication_factor' : 1}";



- yes, the client is on separate VM

- In our project we use Cassandra API version 3.0.2 but the database (cluster) 
is version 3.9

- for 2node cluster:

         first VM: 25 GB RAM, 16 CPUs

         second VM: 16 GB RAM, 16 CPUs




From: Ben Slater <ben.sla...@instaclustr.com<mailto:ben.sla...@instaclustr.com>>
Reply-To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>" 
<user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
Date: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 2:32 PM
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>" 
<user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: Cassandra cluster performance

You would expect some drop when moving to single multiple nodes but on the face 
of it that feels extreme to me (although I’ve never personally tested the 
difference). Some questions that might help provide an answer:
- what consistency level are you using for the test?
- what is your keyspace definition (replication factor most importantly)?
- where are you running your test client (is it a separate box to cassandra)?
- what C* version?
- what are specs (CPU, RAM) of the test servers?

Cheers
Ben

On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 at 09:26 Branislav Janosik -T (bjanosik - AAP3 INC at 
Cisco) <bjano...@cisco.com<mailto:bjano...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi all,

I’m working on a project and we have Java benchmark test for testing the 
performance when using Cassandra database. Create operation on a single node 
Cassandra cluster is about 15K operations per second. Problem we have is when I 
set up cluster with 2 or more nodes (each of them are on separate virtual 
machines and servers), the performance goes down to 1K ops/sec. I follow the 
official instructions on how to set up a multinode cluster – the only things I 
change in Cassandra.yaml file are: change seeds to IP address of one node, 
change listen and rpc address to IP address of the node and finally change 
endpoint snitch to GossipingPropertyFileSnitch. The replication factor is set 
to 1 when having 2-node cluster. I use only one datacenter. The cluster seems 
to be doing fine (I can see nodes communicating) and so is the CPU, RAM usage 
on the machines.

Does anybody have any ideas? Any help would be very appreciated.

Thanks!

A must visit exhibition for all Fitness and Sports Freaks. TOI Global Sports 
Business Show from 21 to 23 December 2016 Bombay Exhibition Centre, Mumbai. 
Meet the legends Kaizzad Capadia, Bhaichung Bhutia and more. Join the workshops 
on Boxing & Football and more. www.TOI-GSBS.com
  • Cassandra cluster perf... Branislav Janosik -T (bjanosik - AAP3 INC at Cisco)
    • Re: Cassandra clu... Ben Slater
      • Re: Cassandra... Branislav Janosik -T (bjanosik - AAP3 INC at Cisco)
        • Re: Cassa... Ben Slater
          • Re: C... Branislav Janosik -T (bjanosik - AAP3 INC at Cisco)
            • ... kurt Greaves
              • ... Branislav Janosik -T (bjanosik - AAP3 INC at Cisco)
        • RE: Cassa... Abhishek Kumar Maheshwari
          • Re: C... Branislav Janosik -T (bjanosik - AAP3 INC at Cisco)
            • ... kurt Greaves
              • ... Kant Kodali
                • ... Branislav Janosik -T (bjanosik - AAP3 INC at Cisco)
                • ... Jonathan Haddad
                • ... Branislav Janosik -T (bjanosik - AAP3 INC at Cisco)

Reply via email to