Thanks Amit & Oskar

Thanks,
Kathir

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Oskar Kjellin <oskar.kjel...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> There is no harm in running it tho. If it's not needed it will simply
> terminate. Better to be safe
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 9 Jan 2017, at 08:13, Amit Singh F <amit.f.si...@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>
>
>
> Generally Upgradesstables are only recommended when you plan to move with
> Major version like  from 2.0 to 2.1  or from 2.1 to 2.2 etc. Since you are
> doing minor version upgrade no need to run upgradesstables utility.
>
>
>
> Link by Datastax might be helpful to you :
>
>
>
> https://support.datastax.com/hc/en-us/articles/208040036-
> Nodetool-upgradesstables-FAQ
>
>
>
> *From:* Kathiresan S [mailto:kathiresanselva...@gmail.com
> <kathiresanselva...@gmail.com>]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 04, 2017 12:22 AM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Incremental repair for the first time
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
> We are planning to upgrade to 3.0.10 for this issue.
>
>
>
> From the NEWS txt file (https://github.com/apache/
> cassandra/blob/trunk/NEWS.txt), it looks like there is no need for
> sstableupgrade when we upgrade from 3.0.4 to 3.0.10 (i.e. Just installing
> 3.0.10 Cassandra would suffice and it will work with the sstables created
> by 3.0.4 ?)
>
>
>
> Could you please confirm (if i'm reading the upgrade instructions
> correctly)?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kathir
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 5:28 PM, kurt Greaves <k...@instaclustr.com>
> wrote:
>
> No workarounds, your best/only option is to upgrade (plus you get the
> benefit of loads of other bug fixes).
>
>
>
> On 16 December 2016 at 21:58, Kathiresan S <kathiresanselva...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
> Is any work around available for this version?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kathir
>
>
>
> On Friday, December 16, 2016, Jake Luciani <jak...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This was fixed post 3.0.4 please upgrade to latest 3.0 release
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Kathiresan S <
> kathiresanselva...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We have a brand new Cassandra cluster (version 3.0.4) and we set up
> nodetool repair scheduled for every day (without any options for repair).
> As per documentation, incremental repair is the default in this case.
>
> Should we do a full repair for the very first time on each node once and
> then leave it to do incremental repair afterwards?
>
>
>
> *Problem we are facing:*
>
>
>
> On a random node, the repair process throws validation failed error,
> pointing to some other node
>
>
>
> For Eg. Node A, where the repair is run (without any option), throws below
> error
>
>
>
> *Validation failed in /Node B*
>
>
>
> In Node B when we check the logs, below exception is seen at the same
> exact time...
>
>
>
> *java.lang.RuntimeException: Cannot start multiple repair sessions over
> the same sstables*
>
> *        at
> org.apache.cassandra.db.compaction.CompactionManager.doValidationCompaction(CompactionManager.java:1087)
> ~[apache-cassandra-3.0.4.jar:3.0.4]*
>
> *        at
> org.apache.cassandra.db.compaction.CompactionManager.access$700(CompactionManager.java:80)
> ~[apache-cassandra-3.0.4.jar:3.0.4]*
>
> *        at
> org.apache.cassandra.db.compaction.CompactionManager$10.call(CompactionManager.java:700)
> ~[apache-cassandra-3.0.4.jar:3.0.4]*
>
> *        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> ~[na:1.8.0_73]*
>
> *        at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> ~[na:1.8.0_73]*
>
>
>
> Can you please help on how this can be fixed?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kathir
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://twitter.com/tjake
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to