It possible to use large nodes and it will work, the problem of large nodes will be:
- Maintenance like join/remove nodes will take more time. - Larger heap - etc. On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 3:54 PM Joe Obernberger < joseph.obernber...@gmail.com> wrote: > Anyone know where I could find out more information on this? > Thanks! > > -Joe > > On 1/13/2021 8:42 AM, Joe Obernberger wrote: > > Reading the documentation on Cassandra 3.x there is recommendations > > that node size should be ~1TByte of data. Modern servers can have 24 > > SSDs, each at 2TBytes in size for data. Is that a bad idea for > > Cassandra? Does 4.0beta4 handle larger nodes? > > We have machines that have 16, 8TBytes SATA drives - would that be a > > bad server for Cassandra? Would it make sense to run multiple copies > > of Cassandra on the same node in that case? > > > > Thanks! > > > > -Joe > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@cassandra.apache.org > > -- *בברכה,* *יקיר גיברלטר*
