I implore you to stick with releasing RC3. Phoenix 4.0 has no release it
can currently run on. Phoenix doesn't use SingleColumnValueFilter, so it
seems that HBASE-10850 has no impact wrt Phoenix. Can't we get these
additional bugs in 0.98.2 - it's one month away [1]?
James
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:34 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Will target HBASE-10899 also then by that time.
>
> Regards
> Ram
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Understood, Andy.
> >
> > I have integrated fix for HBASE-10850 to 0.98
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I will sink this RC and roll a new one tomorrow.
> > >
> > > However, I may very well release the next RC even if I am the only +1
> > vote
> > > and testing it causes your workstation to catch fire. So please take
> the
> > > time to commit whatever you feel is needed to the 0.98 branch or file
> > > blockers against 0.98.1 in the next 24 hours. This is it for 0.98.1.
> > > 0.98.2 will happen a mere 30 days from the 0.98.1 release.
> > >
> > > > On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I agree with Anoop's assessment.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > >> On Apr 3, 2014, at 2:19 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> After analysing HBASE-10850 I think better we can fix this in 98.1
> > > release
> > > >> itself. Also Phoenix plan to use this 98.1 and Phoenix uses
> essential
> > > CF
> > > >> optimization.
> > > >>
> > > >> Also HBASE-10854 can be included in 98.1 in such a case,
> > > >>
> > > >> Considering those we need a new RC.
> > > >>
> > > >> -Anoop-
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:19 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> > > >> ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> +1 on the RC.
> > > >>> Checked the signature.
> > > >>> Downloaded the source, built and ran the testcases.
> > > >>> Ran Integration Tests with ACL and Visibility labels. Everything
> > looks
> > > >>> fine.
> > > >>> Compaction, flushes etc too.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Regards
> > > >>> Ram
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> +1
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Checked the hash
> > > >>>> Checked the tar layout.
> > > >>>> Played with a single node. Everything seemed good after ITBLL
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The hash is good. Doc. and layout looks good. UI seems fine.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Ran on small cluster w/ default hadoop 2.2 in hbase against a tip
> > of
> > > >>> the
> > > >>>>> branch hadoop 2.4 cluster. Seems to basically work (small big
> > linked
> > > >>>> list
> > > >>>>> test worked).
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> TSDB seems to work fine against this RC.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I don't mean to be stealing our Jon's thunder but in case he is
> too
> > > >>>>> occupied to vote here, I'll note that he has gotten our internal
> > rig
> > > >>>>> running against the tip of the 0.98 branch and it has been
> passing
> > > >>> green
> > > >>>>> running IT tests on a small cluster over hours.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> St.Ack
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> > > apurt...@apache.org
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available for
> > > >>> download
> > > >>>> at
> > > >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC3/ and Maven
> artifacts
> > > >>> are
> > > >>>>> also
> > > >>>>>> available in the temporary repository
> > > >>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1016
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific
> > Time
> > > >>>>> (00:00
> > > >>>>>> PDT) on April 6 on whether or not we should release this as
> > 0.98.1.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>> Best regards,
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> - Andy
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -
> > Piet
> > > >>>> Hein
> > > >>>>>> (via Tom White)
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
>
