+1 to Andrew's suggestion. @Anoop - would you mind verifying whether or not the TestSCVFWithMiniCluster written as a Phoenix query returns the correct results?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>wrote: > This would be my preference also. > > Can someone provide a definitive statement on if a critical/blocker bug > exists for Phoenix or not? If not, we have sufficient votes at this point > to carry the RC and can go forward with the release at the end of the vote > period. > > > > On Apr 3, 2014, at 5:57 PM, James Taylor <jtay...@salesforce.com> wrote: > > > > I implore you to stick with releasing RC3. Phoenix 4.0 has no release it > > can currently run on. Phoenix doesn't use SingleColumnValueFilter, so it > > seems that HBASE-10850 has no impact wrt Phoenix. Can't we get these > > additional bugs in 0.98.2 - it's one month away [1]? > > > > James > > > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:34 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan < > > ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Will target HBASE-10899 also then by that time. > >> > >> Regards > >> Ram > >> > >> > >>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Understood, Andy. > >>> > >>> I have integrated fix for HBASE-10850 to 0.98 > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Andrew Purtell < > andrew.purt...@gmail.com > >>>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I will sink this RC and roll a new one tomorrow. > >>>> > >>>> However, I may very well release the next RC even if I am the only +1 > >>> vote > >>>> and testing it causes your workstation to catch fire. So please take > >> the > >>>> time to commit whatever you feel is needed to the 0.98 branch or file > >>>> blockers against 0.98.1 in the next 24 hours. This is it for 0.98.1. > >>>> 0.98.2 will happen a mere 30 days from the 0.98.1 release. > >>>> > >>>>> On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I agree with Anoop's assessment. > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Apr 3, 2014, at 2:19 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hb...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> After analysing HBASE-10850 I think better we can fix this in 98.1 > >>>> release > >>>>>> itself. Also Phoenix plan to use this 98.1 and Phoenix uses > >> essential > >>>> CF > >>>>>> optimization. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Also HBASE-10854 can be included in 98.1 in such a case, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Considering those we need a new RC. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -Anoop- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:19 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan < > >>>>>> ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1 on the RC. > >>>>>>> Checked the signature. > >>>>>>> Downloaded the source, built and ran the testcases. > >>>>>>> Ran Integration Tests with ACL and Visibility labels. Everything > >>> looks > >>>>>>> fine. > >>>>>>> Compaction, flushes etc too. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>> Ram > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Checked the hash > >>>>>>>> Checked the tar layout. > >>>>>>>> Played with a single node. Everything seemed good after ITBLL > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The hash is good. Doc. and layout looks good. UI seems fine. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Ran on small cluster w/ default hadoop 2.2 in hbase against a tip > >>> of > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>> branch hadoop 2.4 cluster. Seems to basically work (small big > >>> linked > >>>>>>>> list > >>>>>>>>> test worked). > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> TSDB seems to work fine against this RC. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I don't mean to be stealing our Jon's thunder but in case he is > >> too > >>>>>>>>> occupied to vote here, I'll note that he has gotten our internal > >>> rig > >>>>>>>>> running against the tip of the 0.98 branch and it has been > >> passing > >>>>>>> green > >>>>>>>>> running IT tests on a small cluster over hours. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> St.Ack > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Andrew Purtell < > >>>> apurt...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available for > >>>>>>> download > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC3/ and Maven > >> artifacts > >>>>>>> are > >>>>>>>>> also > >>>>>>>>>> available in the temporary repository > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1016 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here: > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific > >>> Time > >>>>>>>>> (00:00 > >>>>>>>>>> PDT) on April 6 on whether or not we should release this as > >>> 0.98.1. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Best regards, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> - Andy > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - > >>> Piet > >>>>>>>> Hein > >>>>>>>>>> (via Tom White) > >> >
