Yay! Thanks for all the effort on these providers!
On 9 May 2017 at 08:06, Andrew Gaul <g...@apache.org> wrote: > I promoted the B2 and GCS providers from labs to core in the master > branch which will become 2.1.0. We use the labs repository to incubate > providers and promote them to core after they mature. Users should > update their maven groupIDs from org.apache.jclouds.labs to > org.apache.jclouds.provider in your applications. > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 08:00:00PM -0400, Andrew Gaul wrote: >> Honestly, we could promote GCS to core today -- let's skip the >> intermediate step. The URL signers are not much work which I could >> implement some time next week. The InputStream hack uses multipart >> upload to hack around a jclouds limitation but works fine from a user >> perspective. Can you share your filter-branch commands so I can >> preserve history? >> >> Related, we could promote Backblaze B2 from labs to core. From my >> biased perspective this implementation has high quality. B2 lacks a >> provider guide which I could also write next week. >> >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 09:12:29AM +0100, Ignasi Barrera wrote: >> > Thanks for the links! >> > >> > I don't have a good overview on the status of all the blob store >> > providers, so I trust your criteria. How significant are these issues, >> > when it comes to the BlobStore abstraction? >> > >> > BTW, could we consider moving it to the "labs" repo? It does not make >> > sense to maintain a separate repo just for that provider. Moving to >> > labs does not require a groupId change, so it can be done in master >> > and 2.0.x. >> > >> > On 21 March 2017 at 08:45, Andrew Gaul <g...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > We have a meta-issue[1] tracking exactly this! From my perspective, GCS >> > > lacks temporary signed URLs[2] and has an involved issue with >> > > InputStream payloads[3] which make its implementation inferior to other >> > > blobstore providers. I can sprint on the former for 2.1.0 but the >> > > latter requires some effort. It would be great to eliminate >> > > jclouds-labs-google from a release process so perhaps we could overlook >> > > these issues? >> > > >> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-944 >> > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-902 >> > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-912 >> > > >> > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 08:21:44AM +0100, Ignasi Barrera wrote: >> > >> I'm just wondering if we should think about promoting GCS in the next >> > >> major. And if not, what's missing? >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> I. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Andrew Gaul >> > > http://gaul.org/ >> >> -- >> Andrew Gaul >> http://gaul.org/ > > -- > Andrew Gaul > http://gaul.org/
