Stephen, did you fork the code? Would be good to merge in the changes or at least take a look at them!
Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - Your high performance graph database. http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party. On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Stephen Roos <sr...@careerarcgroup.com> wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Thanks for the quick reply. I tried the configuration mentioned here > ("rest_max_jetty_threads"): > > https://trac.neo4j.org/changeset/6157/laboratory/components/rest > > But it doesn't seem to have changed anything. I took a look through the code > and didn't see any configuration settings exposed in Jetty6WebServer. I > added the changes myself and am starting to see some good results (I've > exposed settings for min/max threadpool size, # acceptor threads, acceptor > queue size, and request buffer size). Is there anything else that you'd > recommend tweaking to improve throughput? > > Thanks again for your help! > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Webber [mailto:j...@neotechnology.com] > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 1:57 AM > To: Neo4j user discussions > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Question about REST interface concurrency > > Hi Stephen, > > The same Jetty tweaks that worked in previous versions will work with 1.3. We > haven't changed any of the Jetty stuff under the covers. > > Jim > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
