tarjei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2. Release Midcom for 1.7 with a simple update script as a stopgap measure. > > Item (2) raises tow new questions: > a) Should this release be done with pear?
Absolutely not. > b) If if should be done with pear, how should we package and run the > tableupdates? The same way as dg handles it now. But pearized MidCOM is not going to be included in some 1.7 release. If we need this , we need to move dg from HEAD to 1-7 branch. > I'm wondering as I'm trying to get the pear installations running on the > testbox and I see this and the issues on static dirs as the main > problems at the moment. 1. Tables create and update. a) Use midgard-schema b) DG automagically handles sql files placed in sql/update subdirectory. 2. I have no idea about static dirs and pear. 3. DG in HEAD supports pear and pearized midcom. This is initial as I still do not know what packages should be installed. Piotras --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
