Martin Cooper wrote:
* Provide a client side JavaScript library that does the grunt work
 of making the back-end XmlHttpRequest call, and updating the
 corresponding portion of your DOM.  Martin likes DOJO for this;
 there are also a bunch of other libraries that do the same sort
 of thing that should be leveraged, instead of inventing something new.

Not everyone likes throwing the kitchen sink into their projects to provide a relatively small amount of functionality.


Where's the kitchen sink in the dojo.io.bind package? It's lean and mean and
robust. It does one thing, and does it very well.

I was referring to Craig's bullet point there, not specifically Dojo. I'd have to look at it more before I would say the same about it, and maybe I'd come to the same conclusion you have in the end.


Huh? You can take any existing Struts app today, add in Dojo, and make
Ajax-like invocations wherever you like. No other changes necessary.

But it requires adding CODE. That to me is an intrusive way to go about it. If it is possible to simple add the capability to the tags that are ALREADY ON THE PAGES, backed by a little XML, that is far less intrusive in my mind than having to add a bunch of code, and if you go the Dojo route, hand-crafted code.


I disagree, at least with respect to what _I_ am talking about. ;-) See my
other post.

Fair enough. We have a difference of opinion here. Nothing wrong with that. If I was presenting this as the way everyone should do things, then it would be a problem, but that has never been my tact on it. I would hope you are not presenting Dojo as the way everyone should do things either Martin :)


Frank


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to