Hi,
for 10k users with default settings, you are not expected to accumulate so many
entries in the history tables, unless you are continuously updating them.
Anyway, especially, if you are not using User Requests, cleaning up those
tables provides no harm.
Regards.
On 06/02/24 14:50, yuefei....@intelliprogroup.com wrote:
Hi Francesco,
I am using Apache Syncope version 3.0.5, database: pgsql 15 and running in a
docker container, using the image apache/syncope:3.0.5
Best regards,
yuefei.liu
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
yuefei....@intelliprogroup.com
*From:* Francesco Chicchiriccò <mailto:ilgro...@apache.org>
*Date:* 2024-02-05 17:30
*To:* user <mailto:user@syncope.apache.org>
*Subject:* Re: Acitiviti tables "act_ru_actinst" too many
Hi yuefei.liu,
you should provide at least which Syncope version you are running, and also
something about the environment (database? Tomcat? which versions?).
Regards.
On 04/02/24 06:40, yuefei....@intelliprogroup.com wrote:
Hello,
I hope this email finds you well. I am currently using Apache Syncope as a
user synchronization tool to sync user and user group information from one
system to another. The number of users is approximately 10,000+.
After running scheduled push and pull tasks for 2-3 months, I have noticed
that the 'act_ru_actinst' table in the database has accumulated millions of
records, leading to a slowdown in synchronization efficiency.
I would like to inquire if it is safe to directly delete these data
records. Your guidance on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
yuefei.liu
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Member at The Apache Software Foundation
Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail
http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
