--- Sasvata Chatterjee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Konstantin, > > Thanks a bunch for chasing this issue. I created > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/XDOCLET-44 and > attached the start of a > patch to implement your suggestion. OK, just inform me when you are ready with a patch. > It is tedious currently to work with Maven2. It > would be great if, between > you and Greg, xdoclet2, xdoclet-plugins POM, > plugin-plugin and plugin-qtags > SNAPSHOTs could be deployed to a Maven2-layout > repository somewhere. Well, codehaus.org has repository, and me & greg can upload there. When we have working M2 plugin for XD2, we can start to create M2 poms also for plugins ( XD2 is already under maven2 pom, and maybe already on codehaus ) > As you say, QDox is not very active. Any idea when > QDox-1.6 can/will be > released? I have no idea. their latest activities are about a year ago ( and I'm too busy to try to take over qdox ) > Also, whenever I build I get some warnings below > (nuisances at best, not > real big problem). Looks like several codehaus JARs > are in a Maven2-layout > REPO, but with Maven-1 POMs. Is there a way to > correct this? > > [WARNING] POM for > 'picocontainer:picocontainer:pom:1.2-RC-2' is > invalid. It > will > be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a > v4.0.0 POM. > [WARNING] POM for > 'nanocontainer:nanocontainer:pom:1.0-RC-3' is > invalid. It > will > be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: Not a > v4.0.0 POM. > [WARNING] POM for 'generama:generama:pom:1.2.1' is > invalid. It will be > ignored f > or artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. > [WARNING] POM for 'qdox:qdox:pom:1.6-SNAPSHOT' is > invalid. It will be > ignored fo > r artifact resolution. Reason: Not a v4.0.0 POM. > [WARNING] POM for > 'xdoclet-plugins:xdoclet-plugin-plugin:pom:1.0.3' is > invalid. > It will be ignored for artifact resolution. Reason: > Not a v4.0.0 POM. Well, we still have version 3.0 poms in place ( as well as picocontainer ) And as we are not using latest released pico ( I'd prefer to wait till final versions are released ) deployed POMs are suboptimal. Although we can start to clean things up... regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality. check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com
