On 2012-10-16 04:11, Brian Barker wrote:
At 16:36 15/10/2012 +0200, Andreas Säger wrote:
Am 15.10.2012 16:20, Brian Barker wrote:
At 14:42 15/10/2012 +0200, Andreas Säger wrote:
Am 15.10.2012 09:49, Pertti Rönnberg wrote:
"if value in cell c3 is /_less than_/ '1' then d3 shall be '0',
else (-- if c3 is '1' or bigger then -- ) use the integer of value
in c3)"
=MIN(0;INT(C3))
This is getting sillier! This formula does not match the definition
above - and indeed for non-negative C3 is identically zero! Try
=0
instead.
Sorry, should be:
=MAX(0;INT(C3))
Again, for positive C3, that is identical to
=INT(C3)
- which was suggested by someone a long way earlier in this thread!
Brian Barker
Were there negative voters, you could use =TRUNC(C3).
This has been an interesting discussion because I have learnt that
INT(-1.1) is 2 and if I want the integer part of -1.1 I need to use TRUNC.
INT returns the next integer less than or equal to the value. TRUNC
returns the integer part of the value (in the format I have shown).
steve
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
