Hey, On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 11:26:28AM -0200, Juan Nin wrote: > Enver ALTIN wrote: > >>It looks like Fred passes additional pairs of key:values without the > >>need of patching Kannel... that would be great! :) > > > >No, he was adding some comments about another solution Stipe proposed, > >so that was a totally different subject. > > I just realized that binfo is a variable that can be passed to sendsms... > > But according to what Fred says it looks like he uses it to pass > aditional parameters to the smpp module... > > is this correct? > can binfo be used to accomplish the modification of esm_class? > > if so, how should it be used?
Let me sum it up, My patch adds another CGI parameter to sendsms called submission_mode, and SMPP will directly set esm_class to that value. Fred's solution was to prevent adding SMSC-specific sendsms parameters by passing a list of name=value pairs via binfo and use that. Both solutions are neither in CVS nor any Kannel release, if you want to set esm_class to something different you'll have to rebuild Kannel by yourself either by using the patch I posted or implementing a different solution on your own. -HTH -- Enver
