Yes, you can do: Cluster A: Host_A0, Host_A1... + VNET_A0, VNET_A1... Cluster B: HostB0, HostB1... + VNET_B0, VNET_B1... Cluster Default: DS, DS_System
Then a VM that uses VNET_A0 + DS would be scheduled to Cluster A. Note that using VNET_A0 constrain resources from Cluster A + Cluster Default. Cheers Ruben On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Steven C Timm <t...@fnal.gov> wrote: > I know if I just take the vnet and the datastore out of the cluster, and have > no clusters at all, then everything > will work.. I was hoping to have a cluster structure of (host,vnet) pairings > that could > all share a common data store. However from the documentation, it looks like > if > your template requests any resource that is part of a cluster (vnet or image > from datastore) > then the scheduler will constrain you to resources that are part of that same > cluster. > > Is that correct? > > Steve Timm > > ________________________________________ > From: Ruben S. Montero [rsmont...@opennebula.org] > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 3:11 PM > To: Steven C Timm > Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org > Subject: Re: [one-users] clusters in 4.8 > > Hi > > If both clusters has access to the same datastores, just move them out > of the first cluster. When a datastore or network is not assigned to > any cluster (cluster default) OpenNebula assumes it can be used with > any host (no matter in which cluster is set). > > BTW, although you do not needed for your use case, 4.12 will come with > extended VDC support to create complex provision scenarios. Basically > you can define generic "resource providers" that aggregate any > resource (cluster, host, network, datastores) more here > http://opennebula.org/4-12-features-virtual-data-center-redesign/ > > Cheers > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Steven Timm <t...@fnal.gov> wrote: >> >> I have had my one4.8 host up for a while with a single cluster >> that has 150 hosts, one vnet, and a system and image datastore. >> >> I am now adding hosts from a different vnet. >> want to make second host + vnet cluster but still use >> the same system and image data stores. >> >> What's the right way to do that.. just remove the datastores >> from the first cluster... they can't be in more than one >> cluster at a time, can they? >> >> >> Thanks for any suggestions. >> >> Steve Timm >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Steven C. Timm, Ph.D (630) 840-8525 >> t...@fnal.gov http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/ >> Office: Wilson Hall room 804 >> Fermilab Scientific Computing Division, >> Scientific Computing Facilities Quadrant., >> Experimental Computing Facilities Dept., >> Project Lead for Virtual Facility Project. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@lists.opennebula.org >> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > > > > -- > Ruben S. Montero, PhD > Project co-Lead and Chief Architect > OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple > www.OpenNebula.org | rsmont...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula -- Ruben S. Montero, PhD Project co-Lead and Chief Architect OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | rsmont...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
