felix uses maven-bundle-plugin.  Not sure why  plugin name is important here.

-D

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Stephen Connolly
<stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9 October 2012 21:12, Mark Donszelmann <mark.donszelm...@cern.ch> wrote:
>
>>  Hi
>>
>>   On Oct 9, 2012, at 7:18 PM, Stephen Connolly <
>> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>>
>> Don't forget to change the artifactId to nar-maven-plugin or such as
>> maven-___-plugin is reserved for maven.apache.org owned plugins
>>
>>
>>  I guess that is correct, however Jason (van Zyl) at the time told me to
>> use maven-nar-plugin...
>>
>>
> That guidance has changed.
>
>
>>  Regards
>> Duns
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 9 October 2012, Curtis Rueden wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> > Feel free to create it an invite the people :)
>>>
>>> Done:
>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/maven-nar
>>>
>>> Let's continue this thread there!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Curtis
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Martin Eisengardt <
>>> martin.eisenga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> > Also, rather than migrating a fork directly, perhaps (if Mark agrees) we
>>> >> could migrate the @duns repo, then push all of Greg's changes back on
>>> top?
>>> >> That way, existing GitHub forks will all state "forked from
>>> >> maven-nar/maven-nar-plugin" afterward, which would be ideal. And to
>>> >> preserve old links Mark could fork it back into @duns again and update
>>> the
>>> >> README to state what happened. Thoughts?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Sounds like a good plan. However I did not compare the forks so I do not
>>> > have an idea how many work has to be done. But I will have a look in the
>>> > next days.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> Presumably we would also want to similarly migrate cpptasks-parallel?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > I think so. It isn't maintained too (correct me if I am wrong).
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> > Technical features can be discussed in the github wiki at the moment.
>>> >>
>>> >> Martin, shall we create a mailing list for the project? Perhaps a
>>> Google
>>> >> group? Then we can migrate this discussion there instead.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Feel free to create it an invite the people :)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> Regarding cross-compilation: I know it is of interest (wouldn't it be
>>> >> great to build for multiple target platforms all from the CloudBees
>>> Jenkins
>>> >> on Linux?). My colleague has done quite a lot of work in that area, but
>>> >> there are some substantial obstacles. Shall we discuss further on our
>>> shiny
>>> >> new maven-nar-plugin mailing list, once it exists?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Yeah, we should discuss it in a working group with experience on this
>>> > topic. Setting up cross compilation and having a maven-nar-plugin
>>> > supporting it is not that easy.
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to