Hi Laurent,
I love bleeding edge stuff, but I don’t like SM stuff … guess java 9 multi-jars
sound more SM than bleeding edge for me.
Guess it would not be good to base the build of an Apache project on that ;-)
Chris
Am 10.06.17, 09:31 schrieb "Laurent Perez" <hak...@gmail.com>:
On a side note, in a few months, if you like to live dangerously, java9
comes with built-in support for multijar :
http://in.relation.to/2017/02/13/building-multi-release-jars-with-maven/
laurent
2017-06-09 14:07 GMT+02:00 Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com>:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Paul Hammant wrote:
>
> > Older releases tried to have a single jar that had adaptive bytecode
> > within, right Jörg
> >
> > Specifically, class file formats 49, 50, 51 in one Jar.
>
> This is still the case. The -java7 version just omits class files
> targetting
> Java 8, because in some environments they cause harm if the runtime is not
> yet Java 8 compatible (Android, app servers scanning jars for annotations
> ...).
>
> Cheers,
> Jörg
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
<a href="http://blog.jdeuxe.info/";>http://blog.jdeuxe.info/ - Java
entreprise tips & tricks</a>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
