Hey Andy, The license inside might not be good enough ;)
Greets, Roy > On 3 Apr 2017, at 22:50, Andreas Schaefer <schaef...@mac.com> wrote: > > Why is that necessary? The one from Adobe isn't good enough? > > - Andy Schaefer > >> On Apr 3, 2017, at 3:23 AM, Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Greg, >> >>> On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 13:18 +0200, Greg Fullard wrote: >>> Hi All >>> >>> I see that there is some difference between how content projects are >>> handled between the Sling IDE tools and the Maven archetypes. >>> >>> >>> 1. The "Sling Content Project" wizard creates a project with a >>> jcr_root >>> folder which then contains folders and content.xml files. This is >>> very >>> similar to what I'm used to with AEM Archetype 10. >> >> In addition to what others have said, there is plan ( with no time >> commitment ) to add our own content-package Maven plugin, which would >> make this kind of project usable with Maven. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6081 >> >> Robert >> >>> 2. The sling-initial-content-archetype, on the other hand, >>> generates a >>> SLING-INF folder with an XML node descriptor file (as explained at >>> http://sling.apache.org/documentation/bundles/content-loading-jcr- >>> contentloader.html >>> ) >>> 3. The Slingbucks example uses JSON descriptor files. >>> >>> >>> Obviously all these methods work, but I'm interested to get an idea >>> of what >>> the recommended method is. Perhaps based on specific criteria of my >>> project? >>> >>> Much appreciated >>> >>> Greg >>> >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
