On Feb 21, 2007, at 11:42 PM, R Lists06 wrote:
Do you use bayes_auto_learn ?
I am sure you know I don't mean AWL baloney. ;-)
Hm. Your experience differs from mine. I tried using bayes, spent
hundreds of hours training bayes with lots of good mail from
archives, and lots of bad mail, and never got better than .5% (point-
five or .005) difference in spam detection. So we stopped using it.
In comparison, we've jacked the AWL score range and this works great
for us.
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source
and other randomness
