On 18/12/2009 3:09 AM, LuKreme wrote: > On 18-Dec-2009, at 00:24, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: >> From the data we have from mass-checks we are erring a very small amount >> on the side of caution by not disabling the whitelists by default. > > > I guess that the real issue that I have with the whole HABEAS thing is the > magnitude of the default scores. −4 and −8 caused issues that would never > have arisen had the defaults been −0.4 and −0.8. Or even −1 and −2.
The scores have been decreased in the upcoming proposed release ruleset. Not to -0.4 and -0.8, but they're no longer -4 and -8. I'm sure that we'll get to (it's been -4 and -8 for years, we're not in a huge rush to do anything now) decreasing them in the 3.2.x sa-update ruleset also once we've firmed up an opinion of what they should be going forward. Please stop beating the -4 and -8 horse. We agree. Daryl
