On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 20:22 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 02 Sep 2014, at 19:11 , Alex <mysqlstud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > However, spam with scores greater than 9.0 aren't being autolearned:
> 
> I believe the score threshold is the base score WITHOUT bayes.
> 
> Try running the email through with a -D flag and see what you get.
> 
> (And that is only a partial answer, the threshold number ignores
> certain classes of tests beyond bayes,but I don't remember which ones.
> It's unfortunate that the learn_threshold_spam uses a number that
> appears to be related to the spam score, because it isn't.

It is. Using the accompanying, non-Bayes score-set. To avoid direct
Bayes self-feeding, and other rules indirect self-feeding due to Bayes-
enabled scores.

BTW, if one knows of that mysterious (bayes_auto_) learn_threshold_spam
you mentioned, one found the AutoLearnThreshold doc mentioning exactly
that: Bayes auto-learning is based on non-Bayes scores.


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}

Reply via email to