On 02 Sep 2014, at 20:50 , Karsten Bräckelmann <guent...@rudersport.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 20:22 -0600, LuKreme wrote: >> On 02 Sep 2014, at 19:11 , Alex <mysqlstud...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> However, spam with scores greater than 9.0 aren't being autolearned: >> >> I believe the score threshold is the base score WITHOUT bayes. >> >> Try running the email through with a -D flag and see what you get. >> >> (And that is only a partial answer, the threshold number ignores >> certain classes of tests beyond bayes,but I don't remember which ones. >> It's unfortunate that the learn_threshold_spam uses a number that >> appears to be related to the spam score, because it isn't. > > It is. Using the accompanying, non-Bayes score-set. To avoid direct > Bayes self-feeding, and other rules indirect self-feeding due to Bayes- > enabled scores. > > BTW, if one knows of that mysterious (bayes_auto_) learn_threshold_spam > you mentioned, one found the AutoLearnThreshold doc mentioning exactly > that: Bayes auto-learning is based on non-Bayes scores. But that is not the case, You can have a score without bayes that exceeds the threshold and still have the message not auto learned. -- 'They're the cream!' Rincewind sighed. 'Cohen, they're the cheese.'
