On 21/06/2016 03:54, mw...@loftware.com wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] >> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 11:32 AM >> To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: session-timeout and maxInactiveInterval >> >> On 20/06/2016 16:00, mw...@loftware.com wrote: >>> We are running 7.0.69 and Java 1.8.0_91. >>> >>> We ran into an incident at a customer where the customer had set >>> session-timeout to 0 – which according to the servlet 3.0 spec, the >>> session should never time out. However, the customer was basically >>> seeing the session timeout immediately. When we changed >>> session-timeout to a larger number (30) and restarted, the problem >> immediately went away. >> >> Set how? >> >> I've looked through the code and everything looks OK. >> >> What is the simplest possible test case that demonstrates this with a clean >> Tomcat install? (I'm thinking of something along the lines of changing the >> timeout in the web.xml for the examples app and adding a JSP that >> demonstrates the problem.) >> >> Mark >> > > +1 > Touche, barking up the wrong tree here. Turns out to be an issue with > Granite, for some reason using the Tomcat parameters, but using them wrong > (fortunately we were able to work around the bug). > > Sorry to waste your time.
Not at all. The question and answer is in the archives and could well proof to provide a useful clue to someone facing a similar issue in the future. Mark > > >>> >>> >>> >>> It looks like setMaxInactiveInterval _/may/_ be using the value of >>> session-timeout if it is not explicitly set, and if so, is not >>> handling the session-timeout = 0 case specially. It also looks like >>> maxInactiveInterval is really controlling the lifetime of the session. >>> But I have also not been through the Tomcat code often, so I am not >>> 100% sure I’m looking in the right spot. >>> >>> >>> >>> Has anyone seen this issue before? Am I misinterpreting something? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The Top 5 Trends in Enterprise Labeling for 2016 >>> <http://resources.loftware.com/2016-Top-5-Trends-Enterprise-Labeling.h >>> tml> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> -- >>> <http://www.loftware.com> >>> >>> 249 Corporate Drive, Portsmouth, NH 03801 >>> Website: loftware.com <http://www.loftware.com/> Connect with us: >>> Twitter <https://twitter.com/#!/LoftwareInc> | LinkedIn >>> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/loftware> | Google+ >>> <https://plus.google.com/116786447658424744021/posts> >>> What is Enterprise Labeling? >>> <http://loftware.com/topics/what-is-enterprise-labeling.cfm> Why it's >>> essential for global businesses. >>> Visit the Enterprise Labeling Blog for all of your industry news >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
