Thanks for the response. Is there any problem in fixing this method to actually set the variable (which is already in the class)?
I think the set methods should actually set the values, so others can write such extensions without putting their code in the apache packages. Right now I guess the only thing I can do is to either use the valve class referenced in this bug report or put my class in an apache package, which I don't think it belongs to. I see that the class you pointed to is also in an apache package just for that reason. E ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org> Sent: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 02:13:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Cannot set remote address in valve (Tomcat 5.5) https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47330 is on the todo list but my current plan is to implement it as a Filter rather than a valve. What is the issue with using a Filter? If you really want to write a filter than that bug report should be all you need. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
