I totally agree,
It should be user choice :)
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 13:45, nino martinez wael <
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> normally I would agree.. But when our designer gives us the html, and there
> are tables in it we need to change that stuff.. I do not like the idea that
> the web framework forces you to change markup so that it can work.. One
> thing are to teach the devs that there are some quirks with the web
> framework (thats completely expected). But to have to teach the designer
> about a web framework so they can avoid the quirky parts seems wrong.
>
> Its not part of Wickets statement anyhow.
>
> > Just Java & HTML
> >
> > Leverage what you know about Java or your favourite HTML editor to write
> > Wicket applications. With pure Java code and HTML markup Wicket is the
> > go-to web framework for purists.
> >
>
> /rant off :)
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 8:24 AM Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > if something "look like a duck, walk like a duck and sound like a duck" -
> > it is duck :)
> > CSS table are tables, but with no HTML '<table>' tags :)
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 13:22, nino martinez wael <
> > nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > if its CSS its not a table right?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 7:25 AM Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Actually you can :)
> > > > But you need CSS tables for this :)
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 11:53, nino martinez wael <
> > > > nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I agree with Maxim, but I do not know the side effects, im going to
> > try
> > > > > it.. As it is now (out of the box), we cannot have nested forms in
> > > tables
> > > > > (for example on form per <tr>) without breaking html.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Nino
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 3:24 AM Maxim Solodovnik <
> > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I would say we can create overridable method so users can specify
> > > which
> > > > > tag
> > > > > > to use
> > > > > > it will help with `<tr>`
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 01:39, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think we could improve nested Forms so that only <form> tags
> > are
> > > > > > > turned into a <div>, but anything else stays as it is.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > WDYT?
> > > > > > > Sven
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Am 23.04.19 um 10:01 schrieb nino martinez wael:
> > > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > When nesting forms, the form tag are changed to an div and it
> > is
> > > > hard
> > > > > > > coded:
> > > > > > > > org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/Form.java:1597
> > > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > tag.setName("div");
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If only I could change the tag to be tr, it would produce
> valid
> > > > html.
> > > > > > Are
> > > > > > > > it deliberate to be hardcoded?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > WBR
> > > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
> > > > > Nino Martinez
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > WBR
> > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
> > > Nino Martinez
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
> Nino Martinez
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
