Thanks, good to know.
 

 
Sven
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
>  
> On 26.04.2019 at 07:33,  <nino martinez wael>  wrote:
>  
>  
>  until next version comes out, this lump of code seems to be working: Form 
> actionForm=new Form<>("actionForm"){ @Override protected void 
> onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) { super.onComponentTag(tag); 
> tag.setName("tr"); } } ; On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:28 AM Sven Meier wrote:  
> >   >   >  Hi Nino,  >   >   >   >  I've taken the liberty of improving this 
> with WICKET-6658:  >   >  No need to let Form enforce a 
>  
> -tag when it's changed into a div  >  afterwards (in case of nested forms).  
> >   >   >   >  Have fun  >   >  Sven  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   
> >   >   >   >   >   >  On 24.04.2019 at 08:45, wrote:  >   >   >   >   >   >  
> normally I would agree.. But when our designer gives us the html, and  >  
> there are tables in it we need to change that stuff.. I do not like the  >  
> idea that the web framework forces you to change markup so that it can  >  
> work.. One thing are to teach the devs that there are some quirks with the  > 
>  web framework (thats completely expected). But to have to teach the  >  
> designer about a web framework so they can avoid the quirky parts seems  >  
> wrong. Its not part of Wickets statement anyhow.  >  Just Java  &  HTML  >   
> >   >  Leverage what you know about Java or your favourite HTML editor to  >  
> write  >  Wicket applications. With pure Java code and HTML markup Wicket  >  
> is the  >  go-to web framework for purists.  >  /rant off :) On Wed, Apr  >  2
4, 2019 at 8:24 AM Maxim Solodovnik wrote:  >  if something "look like a  >  
duck, walk like a duck and sound like a duck" -  >  it is duck :)  >  CSS  >  
table are tables, but with no HTML '' tags :)  >   >  On Wed, 24 Apr 2019  >  
at 13:22, nino martinez wael  <   >  nino.martinez.  >  w...@gmail.com>  wrote: 
 >   >   >  if its CSS its not a table right?  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   
>  On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 7:25 AM Maxim  >  Solodovnik  >   >  wrote:  >   >   
>   >   >  Actually you can :)  >   >   >   >  But you need CSS tables for this 
:)  >   >   >   >   >   >  On Wed, 24  >  Apr 2019 at 11:53, nino martinez wael 
 <   >   >   >   >  nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com>  wrote:  >   >   >   >   >   
>   >  I agree  >  with Maxim, but I do not know the side effects, im going to  
>  try  >   >   >   >   >  it.. As it is now (out of the box), we cannot have 
nested forms in  >   >   >  tables  >   >   >   >  (for example on form per ) 
without breaking  >  html.  >   >   >   >   >   >  
 >   >  -Nino  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 3:24 
 > AM Maxim Solodovnik  <   >   >  solomax...@gmail.com  >   >   >   >   >   >  
 >  >  wrote:  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  I would say we can create 
 > overridable method so users  >  can specify  >   >  which  >   >   >   >  
 > tag  >   >   >   >   >  to use  >   >   >   >   >   >  it will help with ``  
 > >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 01:39, 
 > Sven Meier wrote:  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  Hi,  >   > 
 >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  I  >  think we could improve nested 
 > Forms so that only  >   >   >   >  tags  >  are  >   >   >   >   >   >  
 > turned into a  >   >   >   >  , but anything else stays as it is.  >   >   > 
 >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  WDYT?  >   >   >   >   >   >  Sven  
 > >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  Am 23.04.19 um 10:01 
 > schrieb nino martinez wael:  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  Hi  >   >   >   
 > >   >   >   >
   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  When nesting forms, the form tag are changed 
to an div and it  >   >  is  >   >   >  hard  >   >   >   >   >   >  coded:  >  
 >   >   >   >   >   >   >  org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/Form.java:1597  
>   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  ...  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   
>   >   >   >  tag.setName("div");  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   
>   >   >   >  ...  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  If 
only I could  >  change the tag to be tr, it would produce valid  >   >   >  
html.  >   >   >   >   >   >  Are  >   >   >   >   >   >   >  it deliberate to 
be hardcoded?  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   
>   >   >   >   >   >   >  -------------------------  >  
--------------------------------------------  >   >   >   >   >   >  To  >  
unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org  >   >   >   >   >   > 
  >  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org  >   > 
  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   > 
  >   >  --  >   >   >   >   >  WBR  >   >   >   >   >  Maxim aka solomax  >   
>   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  --  >   >   
>   >   >  Best regards / Med venlig hilsen  >   >   >   >  Nino Martinez  >   
>   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  --  >   >   >  WBR  >   >   
>   >  Maxim aka solomax  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  --  >   >   >  
Best regards / Med venlig hilsen  >   >  Nino Martinez  >   >   >   >   >   >  
--  >  WBR  >  Maxim aka solomax  >  -- Best regards / Med venlig hilsen  >  
Nino Martinez  >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   
>   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >   >  -- Best regards / Med venlig 
hilsen Nino Martinez
>  
     

Reply via email to