On 10.09, Evan Nemerson wrote: > This is something I've been thinking about lately, too. We currently > rely on Jürg and Luca's expertise pretty heavily for development and > patch review, and since they are both busy with other stuff Vala > development has slowed down quite a bit. > > Assuming we can't organize financing to pay Jürg and/or Luca to work on > Vala, I think we need to focus on a more decentralized development > approach where we rely more on contributions from people with less > expertise with the Vala internals.
I agree that a more decentralized approach would be better, but as I said that can't possibly happen if nobody ever even tries to work with valac internals. Basically, I'm not saying that Jürg or Luca need to even work on valac, but a patch review now and then would already help a lot. And some of those patches are really quite simple and obviously correct, but no review except theirs has any weight. > <snip, rest of the mail> I assume "more testing" is basically interesting because we need less (sophisticated) review? That might be true from a functionality POV but not regarding architecture etc. But more tests are always good of course. _______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list vala-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
