On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:13:02AM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 18.03.2013 08:41, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
> >
> > The cutting process now works without segfaulting or unbehavior exit
> > of the vdr process itself - but during cutting i got A LOT of "frame
> > larger than buffer" x greater then 8 (8 is fix in all messages).
> > -----------
> > Mar 18 08:30:12 s01 vdr: [50364416] ERROR: frame larger than buffer (17392 
> > > 8)
> > Mar 18 08:30:12 s01 vdr: [50364416] ERROR: frame larger than buffer (17514 
> > > 8)
> > Mar 18 08:30:12 s01 vdr: [50364416] video cutting thread ended (pid=33513, 
> > tid=50364416)
> > Mar 18 08:30:13 s01 vdr: [50361344] info: Schnitt beendet
> > -----------
> > The cutting ends now always normally.
> 
> I guess the problem is that Juergen has allocated the buffers on the
> heap, but did not change the places where the buffer size is determined
> using sizeof(buffer) and sizeof(buffer2). If you replace these with
> MAXFRAMESIZE it should work.

Yes, this works fine. I've had to add this to Juergen's patch:
---------
@@ -108,7 +119,7 @@                                                             
                                     
                  CurrentFileNumber = FileNumber;                               
                                     
                  }                                                             
                                     
               if (fromFile) {                                                  
                                     
-                 int len = ReadFrame(fromFile, buffer,  Length, 
sizeof(buffer));                                    
+                 int len = ReadFrame(fromFile, buffer,  Length, MAXFRAMESIZE); 
                                     
                  if (len < 0) {                                                
                                     
                     error = "ReadFrame";                                       
                                     
                     break;                                                     
                                     
@@ -193,7 +204,7 @@                                                             
                                     
                     if (FileNumber != CurrentFileNumber)                       
                                     
                        fromFile = fromFileName->SetOffset(FileNumber, 
FileOffset);                                  
                     if (fromFile) {                                            
                                     
-                       int len = ReadFrame(fromFile, buffer2, Length2, 
sizeof(buffer2));                            
+                       int len = ReadFrame(fromFile, buffer2, Length2, 
MAXFRAMESIZE);                               
                        if (len >= 0 && len == Length2)                         
                                     
                           CheckForSeamlessStream = true;                       
                                     
                        }
---------------

First I'm (me.noob <g>!) tried it with sizeof(MAXFRAMESIZE), the
result was not what i expected ;-)
But i consulted K&R, both mean heap and stack were realy nice
things... Hej, i'm a ruby guy, we have garbage collectors ;-)

I think Juergen will make a "final patch", i don't know if above
changes are well for all platforms, maybe a #ifdef __FreeBSD__ is
needed.
But for me: it works!

Thanks for a wonderfull piece oft software!
> 
> Klaus
> 

Regards
        Gerhard

> >> --- cutter.c.orig
> >> +++ cutter.c
> >> @@ -83,7 +83,18 @@ void cCuttingThread::Action(void)
> >>        int LastIFrame = 0;
> >>        toMarks.Add(0);
> >>        toMarks.Save();
> >> +#ifdef __FreeBSD__
> >> +     // XXX save thread stack space
> >> +     uchar *buffer = MALLOC(uchar, MAXFRAMESIZE);
> >> +     uchar *buffer2 = MALLOC(uchar, MAXFRAMESIZE);
> >> +     if (buffer == NULL || buffer2 == NULL) {
> >> +        free(buffer);
> >> +        error = "malloc";
> >> +        return;
> >> +        }
> >> +#else
> >>        uchar buffer[MAXFRAMESIZE], buffer2[MAXFRAMESIZE];
> >> +#endif
> >>        int Length2;
> >>        bool CheckForSeamlessStream = false;
> >>        bool LastMark = false;
> >> @@ -216,6 +227,10 @@ void cCuttingThread::Action(void)
> >>                 }
> >>              }
> >>        Recordings.TouchUpdate();
> >> +#ifdef __FreeBSD__
> >> +     free(buffer);
> >> +     free(buffer2);
> >> +#endif
> >>        }
> >>     else
> >>        esyslog("no editing marks found!");
> >> --- thread.c.orig
> >> +++ thread.c
> >> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ void cThread::SetPriority(int Priority)
> >>   void cThread::SetIOPriority(int Priority)
> >>   {
> >>   #ifdef __FreeBSD__
> >> -  esyslog("ERROR: syscall(SYS_ioprio_set ...) unsupported on FreeBSD");
> >> +  // esyslog("ERROR: syscall(SYS_ioprio_set ...) unsupported on FreeBSD");
> >>   #else
> >>     if (syscall(SYS_ioprio_set, 1, 0, (Priority & 0xff) | (2 << 13)) < 0) 
> >> // best effort class
> >>        LOG_ERROR;
> 
> _______________________________________________
> vdr mailing list
> vdr@linuxtv.org
> http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

Reply via email to