On 18.03.2013 10:10, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:13:02AM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 18.03.2013 08:41, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
The cutting process now works without segfaulting or unbehavior exit
of the vdr process itself - but during cutting i got A LOT of "frame
larger than buffer" x greater then 8 (8 is fix in all messages).
-----------
Mar 18 08:30:12 s01 vdr: [50364416] ERROR: frame larger than buffer (17392 > 8)
Mar 18 08:30:12 s01 vdr: [50364416] ERROR: frame larger than buffer (17514 > 8)
Mar 18 08:30:12 s01 vdr: [50364416] video cutting thread ended (pid=33513,
tid=50364416)
Mar 18 08:30:13 s01 vdr: [50361344] info: Schnitt beendet
-----------
The cutting ends now always normally.
I guess the problem is that Juergen has allocated the buffers on the
heap, but did not change the places where the buffer size is determined
using sizeof(buffer) and sizeof(buffer2). If you replace these with
MAXFRAMESIZE it should work.
Yes, this works fine. I've had to add this to Juergen's patch:
---------
@@ -108,7 +119,7 @@
CurrentFileNumber = FileNumber;
}
if (fromFile) {
- int len = ReadFrame(fromFile, buffer, Length,
sizeof(buffer));
+ int len = ReadFrame(fromFile, buffer, Length, MAXFRAMESIZE);
if (len < 0) {
error = "ReadFrame";
break;
@@ -193,7 +204,7 @@
if (FileNumber != CurrentFileNumber)
fromFile = fromFileName->SetOffset(FileNumber,
FileOffset);
if (fromFile) {
- int len = ReadFrame(fromFile, buffer2, Length2,
sizeof(buffer2));
+ int len = ReadFrame(fromFile, buffer2, Length2,
MAXFRAMESIZE);
if (len >= 0 && len == Length2)
CheckForSeamlessStream = true;
}
---------------
First I'm (me.noob <g>!) tried it with sizeof(MAXFRAMESIZE), the
result was not what i expected ;-)
But i consulted K&R, both mean heap and stack were realy nice
things... Hej, i'm a ruby guy, we have garbage collectors ;-)
I think Juergen will make a "final patch", i don't know if above
changes are well for all platforms, maybe a #ifdef __FreeBSD__ is
needed.
But for me: it works!
Thanks for a wonderfull piece oft software!
Klaus
Regards
Gerhard
--- cutter.c.orig
+++ cutter.c
@@ -83,7 +83,18 @@ void cCuttingThread::Action(void)
int LastIFrame = 0;
toMarks.Add(0);
toMarks.Save();
+#ifdef __FreeBSD__
+ // XXX save thread stack space
+ uchar *buffer = MALLOC(uchar, MAXFRAMESIZE);
+ uchar *buffer2 = MALLOC(uchar, MAXFRAMESIZE);
+ if (buffer == NULL || buffer2 == NULL) {
+ free(buffer);
+ error = "malloc";
+ return;
+ }
+#else
uchar buffer[MAXFRAMESIZE], buffer2[MAXFRAMESIZE];
+#endif
int Length2;
bool CheckForSeamlessStream = false;
bool LastMark = false;
@@ -216,6 +227,10 @@ void cCuttingThread::Action(void)
}
}
Recordings.TouchUpdate();
+#ifdef __FreeBSD__
+ free(buffer);
+ free(buffer2);
+#endif
}
else
esyslog("no editing marks found!");
--- thread.c.orig
+++ thread.c
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ void cThread::SetPriority(int Priority)
void cThread::SetIOPriority(int Priority)
{
#ifdef __FreeBSD__
- esyslog("ERROR: syscall(SYS_ioprio_set ...) unsupported on FreeBSD");
+ // esyslog("ERROR: syscall(SYS_ioprio_set ...) unsupported on FreeBSD");
#else
if (syscall(SYS_ioprio_set, 1, 0, (Priority & 0xff) | (2 << 13)) < 0) //
best effort class
LOG_ERROR;
For completeness, here's the patch as it will go into the current developer
version.
Klaus
--- cutter.c 2013/02/17 14:11:03 2.24
+++ cutter.c 2013/03/18 09:40:49
@@ -362,11 +362,22 @@
return true;
}
+class cHeapBuffer {
+private:
+ uchar *buffer;
+public:
+ cHeapBuffer(int Size) { buffer = MALLOC(uchar, Size); }
+ ~cHeapBuffer() { free(buffer); }
+ operator uchar * () { return buffer; }
+ };
+
bool cCuttingThread::FramesAreEqual(int Index1, int Index2)
{
+ cHeapBuffer Buffer1(MAXFRAMESIZE);
+ cHeapBuffer Buffer2(MAXFRAMESIZE);
+ if (!Buffer1 || !Buffer2)
+ return false;
bool Independent;
- uchar Buffer1[MAXFRAMESIZE];
- uchar Buffer2[MAXFRAMESIZE];
int Length1;
int Length2;
if (LoadFrame(Index1, Buffer1, Independent, Length1) && LoadFrame(Index2, Buffer2, Independent, Length2)) {
@@ -386,12 +397,14 @@
void cCuttingThread::GetPendingPackets(uchar *Data, int &Length, int Index)
{
+ cHeapBuffer Buffer(MAXFRAMESIZE);
+ if (!Buffer)
+ return;
bool Processed[MAXPID] = { false };
cPacketStorage PacketStorage;
int64_t LastPts = lastVidPts + delta;// adding one frame length to fully cover the very last frame
Processed[patPmtParser.Vpid()] = true; // we only want non-video packets
for (int NumIndependentFrames = 0; NumIndependentFrames < 2; Index++) {
- uchar Buffer[MAXFRAMESIZE];
bool Independent;
int len;
if (LoadFrame(Index, Buffer, Independent, len)) {
@@ -534,8 +547,12 @@
bool SeamlessBegin = LastEndIndex >= 0 && FramesAreEqual(LastEndIndex, BeginIndex);
bool SeamlessEnd = NextBeginIndex >= 0 && FramesAreEqual(EndIndex, NextBeginIndex);
// Process all frames from BeginIndex (included) to EndIndex (excluded):
+ cHeapBuffer Buffer(MAXFRAMESIZE);
+ if (!Buffer) {
+ error = "malloc";
+ return false;
+ }
for (int Index = BeginIndex; Running() && Index < EndIndex; Index++) {
- uchar Buffer[MAXFRAMESIZE];
bool Independent;
int Length;
if (LoadFrame(Index, Buffer, Independent, Length)) {
_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
