Hi Mike,

Thanks for the report.  I'm sure it will be of value to other people
who will consider the template engines in the future.

## Somebody might want to make an xdoc/wiki page for this.  :)

> >>Sorry, I don't know anything about JET, but I was wondering if you
> >>could share with us what you have found about the two.
> >>Shinobu "Kawai" Yoshida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Sure thing, What I have found is that JET or Java Emitter Templates is an
> Eclipse technology www.eclipse.org and part of EMF (though I'm sure it
> could have been made a separate plugin).
> Similar to Velocity, JET takes templates, script and data objects and
> merges the three to create a final output.
> JET uses a JSP like scripting language. JET also allows full translation
> from templates to resulting output
> or you can compile your templates to java classes, and simply invoke the
> java class.
> 
> If your interested in this I have found two really good tutorials on the
> technology which can be found at:
> 
> http://www.eclipse.org/articles/Article-JET/jet_tutorial1.html
> and
> http://www.eclipse.org/articles/Article-JET2/jet_tutorial2.html
> 
> I haven't really come to any conclusions other than JET is built into
> eclipse and supports eclipse projects. The few tests I have
> ran with JET have been very favorable, I didn't run into any problems with
> what I Was trying to do.
> 
> Performance wise I have no ideas how the two compare, though the compile
> to class feature might be nice.
> 
> ALSO I thought I'd mention that while I was researching JET I ran into
> another new technology that is for reporting
> that is being worked on called BIRT (B.I.R.T.). Business Intelligence and
> Reporting Tools,  take a look at
> 
> http://www.eclipse.org/birt/
> 
> Though thats about the extent of my knowledge at this point on it.

Best regards,
-- Shinobu

--
Shinobu Kawai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to