Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Return to earlier question: {was Re: Agazzari guitar [was Re: Capona?]}
Very interesting, Monica. Is Meucci's article readily available anywhere? More to the point, is it in in English? And better still is there a good summary of the key points somewhere!!

Unfortunately it has not been translated into English although it has been translated into French. I suggested to Chris Goodwin that we should get it translated into English but he wasn't very enthusiastic. He suggested that I should do a summary of it and I did start but there aren't enough hous in the day to do everything.

You say

   "il Chitarrino, overo Chitarra Italiana" which suggests that it was a
   small lute rather than  a 4-course guitar.
"

I've heard some sceptical mutterings over the years about the Chitarra Italiana. But now it simply sounds like an Italian version of the mandore which is some kind of survival of the medieval gittern/quintern... small, lute-shaped.

Yes - that seems to be the case.

So: is the 'chitarra Italiana" really just a mandore? (small or smallish, lute-shaped, even,perhaps, carved from the solid in some instances? But with more of a sickle pegbox than a lute pegbox).

Possibly

But then there is the angle which seems to have tickled Roman T: ....that the chitarra Italiana is not from lute/gittern lineage at all. I've only read tiny pieces pieces about the Meucci article but the suggestion seems to be a non-Moorish origin? Or, was Ralf hinting that 'humanist' writers in Italy, writing fancifully, (does Meucci chart all of this?)fancied the origin of the little lute in ancient Greek depictions of the 'pandurina'?

Well - not all of it and it is too late at night for me to go into all of it. But it seems possible that it was the characteristically Neapolitan small lute/mandora which Giustiniani mentions. He says Ettore Gesualdo and Fabrizio Fillamarino use to play it in consort with Carlo Gesualdo no less. He also mentions the sordellino as being a Neapolitan invention. And then there is the buttafuoco. These odd little instruments pop up from time to time and then pop down again.

Monica















    Original Message -----

    From: "Monica Hall"<[1]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
    To: "Martyn Hodgson"<[2]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
    Cc: "Vihuelalist"<[3]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
    Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 4:02 PM
    Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Return to earlier question: {was Re: Agazzari
    guitar [was Re: Capona?]}

    >
> Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Return to earlier question: {was Re: Agazzari
    guitar
    >  [was Re: Capona?]}
    >
    >>    a small 4 course guitar (as described by Cerreto in his 1601
    Neapolitan
    >>    publication).
    >
    >  The instrument described by Cerreto is not a guitar - at least
    according to
    >  Meucci.   Cerreto actually describes it as "lo Strumento della
    Chitarra a
    >  sette Corde, detto Bordelletto alla Taliana".   It is a 4-course
    instrument
    >  with a re-entrant tuning which as he says is imperfetto, por causa
    che in
> esso non vi sono tutte le voci graue como habbiamo nel Strumento del
    Liuto".
    >  He does however mention that the instrument can be strummed.
    >
    >  Cerreto's book was published in Naples and the instrument he was
    describing
> was probably the same as the Chitarrina alla Napoletana called for
    in the
    >  Intermedia i.e. a small lute.   The chitarrina alla spagnola was
> probably the 5-course Spanish guitar. In 1689 these instruments had
    to be
> imported to Florence specially which suggests that they were not in
    common
    >  use in northern Italy.
    >
    >  Sebastian Virdung also describes and illustrates the "Lauten" and
    >  "Quintern";
    >  the quintern is a small lute.
    >
    >  Incidentally the four pieces in Barberiis' book for  a 4-course
    instrument
    >  are also probably for a "Chitarrina  alla Napoletana" - they are
    notated in
    >  "Spanish" tablature i.e. the top line is the highest course.
    >
    >  You have to have read Meucci's article to understand why things
    called
    >  Chitarra etc. are not necessarily guitars.   Unfortunately James
    Tyler
    >  hadn't read Meucci's article and a lot of what he says about the
    4-course
    >  guitar isn't very helpful.
    >
    >  Monica
    >
    >>    --- On Mon, 12/12/11, Monica Hall<[4]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
    wrote:
    >>
    >>      From: Monica Hall<[5]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
    >>      Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Return to earlier question: {was Re:
    Agazzari
    >>      guitar [was Re: Capona?]}
    >>      To: "Martyn Hodgson"<[6]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
    >>      Cc: "Vihuelalist"<[7]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>, "Lex
    Eisenhardt"
    >>      <[8]eisenha...@planet.nl>, "R. Mattes"<[9]r...@mh-freiburg.de>
    >>      Date: Monday, 12 December, 2011, 12:49
    >>
    >>    We seem to have got a bit at cross purposes here - at least I
    have.
>> Agazzari's book was printed in 1607 as far as I am aware. Only
    one
    >>    year
>> after Montesardo. Foscarini's book in mixed style was printed in
    >>    about
>> 1630 and the version of which includes the continuo instructions
    was
    >>    printed
    >>    in 1640.
>> I think that it is unlikely that Agazzari was familiar with the
    >>    chitarra
    >>    spagnuola and had it in mind
>> when he wrote his book. And he includes the chitarrina amongst
    the
    >>    instruments which are not capable of reproducing the bass line.
    I
    >>    can't
    >>    see any reason for regarding it as a guitar at all.   It was
    surely a
    >>    small
    >>    lute?
    >>    Monica
    >>    ----- Original Message -----
    >>    From: "Martyn Hodgson"<[1]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
    >>    To: "Vihuelalist"<[2]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>;
    >>    <[3]eisen...@planet.nl>; "R.
    >>    Mattes"<[4]r...@mh-freiburg.de>
    >>    Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 12:02 PM
    >>    Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Return to earlier question: {was Re:
    Agazzari
    >>    guitar
    >>    [was Re: Capona?]}
    >>    >
    >>    >
>> > Thank you for this - you must have missed my qualifying rider:
    >>    'albeit
>> > later sources' expressing that I am well aware these sources
    are
    >>    not
>> > contemporary with Agazzari. And of course you're quite right
    they
    >>    do
>> > not constitute evidence of what Agazzari was aware. The point
    is
    >>    that
    >>    >    plucking and strumming play was known throughout the early
    >>    (Foscarini)
>> > and later 17th century so it is not possible on the available
    >>    evidence
>> > to state that Aggazzari expected strumming alone - even if he
    >>    allowed
    >>    >    the guitar in basso continuo.......
    >>    >
    >>    >    MH
    >>    >
>> > --- On Mon, 12/12/11, R. Mattes<[5]r...@mh-freiburg.de> wrote:
    >>    >
    >>    >      From: R. Mattes<[6]r...@mh-freiburg.de>
>> > Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Return to earlier question: {was Re:
    >>    Agazzari
    >>    >      guitar [was Re: Capona?]}
    >>    >      To: "Martyn Hodgson"<[7]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>,
    >>    "Vihuelalist"
    >>    >      <[8]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>, [9]eisen...@planet.nl
    >>    >      Date: Monday, 12 December, 2011, 11:44
    >>    >
>> > On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:28:52 +0000 (GMT), Martyn Hodgson wrote
    >>    >    >  Thanks Lex
    >>    >    >
    >>    >    >     Maybe, but plucking to perform basso continuo on the
    guitar
    >>    was
>> > > not unknown if that's what Agazzi really meant (and I'm
    not
>> > > convinced we can interpret his description as excluding BC
    >>    using
>> > > full chords only - eg strummed). Indeed, there are even
    some,
    >>    >    >   allbeit later, sources
>> > > (Matteis, Murcia) which give detailed instructions on
    playing
    >>    >    >  guitar BC   employing only the plucking (lute) style.
>> > Evidence? ;-) You aren't seriously taking those as reliable
    sources
    >>    >    for Agazzari-time performance practise, aren't you? That's
    like
    >>    >    using the film aof the Woodstock festival as a source for
    Johann
    >>    >    Strauss (the IInd) walzer performance ...
>> > Just to be clear: I don't argue for banning guitars from early
    >>    baroque
>> > continuo section, I jsut think we should be a little bit more
    >>    careful
    >>    >    in what sources we draw our information from.
    >>    >    Cheers, Ralf Mattes
    >>    >    >  Corbetta in
>> > > his intabulated vocal/instrumental settings is also fairly
    >>    >    >  restrained: using plucking   play with the occasional
    strummed
    >>    chord.
    >>    >    >
    >>    >    >     Martyn
    >>    >    >
    >>    >    >     --- On Mon, 12/12/11, [1][10]eisen...@planet.nl
    >>    >    <[2][11]eisen...@planet.nl>  wrote:
    >>    >    >
    >>    >    >       From: [3][12]eisen...@planet.nl
    <[4][13]eisen...@planet.nl>
    >>    >    >       Subject: RE: Return to earlier question: {was Re:
    [VIHUELA]
    >>    Re:
    >>    >    >       Agazzari guitar [was Re: Capona?]}
    >>    >    >       To: "Martyn Hodgson"
    <[5][14]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>,
    >>    >    "Vihuelalist"
    >>    >    >       <[6][15]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
    >>    >    >       Date: Monday, 12 December, 2011, 9:55
    >>    >    >
    >>    >    >     Hi,
    >>    >    >     I'm not so sure about the 'etc.'
    >>    >    >     It seems that Agazzari was thinking in terms of
    counterpoint,
    >>    the
    >>    >    >  way   the guitar was used (strumming) does not fit in
    easily. In
    >>    the
>> > > end, there were more composers who were criticizing the
    use of
    >>    the
    >>    >    >  guitar
    >>    >    >     (Castaldi), at that time. I suppose that the plucked
    >>    chitarrina
    >>    >    could
    >>    >    >     be one of the melodic instruments on his list.
    >>    >    >     Lex
    >>    >    >
    >>    >
    __________________________________________________________________
    >>    >    >
    >>    >    >     Van: Martyn Hodgson
    [mailto:[7][16]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk]
    >>    >    >     Verzonden: ma 12-12-2011 10:24
    >>    >    >     Aan: Vihuelalist; [8][17]eisen...@planet.nl
>> > > Onderwerp: Return to earlier question: {was Re: [VIHUELA]
    Re:
    >>    >    Agazzari
    >>    >    >     guitar [was Re: Capona?]}
    >>    >    >     Thanks Lex.
    >>    >    >
>> > > Yes, these sources are fairly well known - I'm just not
    sure
>> > > terminoligy was sufficiently standardised at the time to
    draw
>> > > unequivocal conclusions and the question as to whether
    >>    Agazzari
>> > > had Millioni's four-course guitar, 'chitarrino' in mind
    or
    >>    the
    >>    >    >     instrument required in the Conserto vaga is open.
    >>    >    >
    >>    >    >     But to return to the original question: did Agrazzi
    >>    purposefully
    >>    >    omit
>> > > the chitarra spagnuola from his list of instruments as
    >>    suitable
>> > > for basso continuo, or is it included in the etcetera...?
    I
    >>    >    >  suggested that   since he does not list the instrument
    amongst
    >>    those
>> > > suitable for embellishment then he did think it suitable
    for
>> > > continuo (if rarer than the instruments he did singled
    out).
>> > > However, I'm certainly not advocating even more banging
    and
    >>    >    >  thrashing about as fashionable amongst   some modern
    continuo
    >>    >    groupings......
    >>    >    >
    >>    >    >     regards
    >>    >    >
    >>    >    >     Martyn
    >>    >    >
    >>    >    >     --
    >>    >    >
    >>    >    >  To get on or off this list see list information at
    >>    >    >
    [9][18]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
    >>    >    --
    >>    >    R. Mattes -
    >>    >    Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg
    >>    >    [10][19]r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de
    >>    >
    >>    >    --
    >>    >
    >>    >  References
    >>    >
    >>    >    1.
    >>
    [20]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
    >>    >    2.
    >>
    [21]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
    >>    >    3.
    >>
    [22]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
    >>    >    4.
    >>
    [23]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
    >>    >    5.
    >>    >
    >>

[24]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co
    >>    .uk
    >>    >    6.
    >>

[25]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihuela@cs.dartmouth.e
    >>    du
    >>    >    7.
    >>    >
    >>

[26]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co
    >>    .uk
    >>    >    8.
    >>
    [27]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
>> > 9. [28]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
    >>    >   10.
    >>

[29]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de
    >>    >
    >>
    >>    --
    >>
    >>  References
    >>
    >>    1.
    >>

[10]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co
    .uk
    >>    2.

[11]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihuela@cs.dartmouth.e
    du
    >>    3.
    [12]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
    >>    4.
    [13]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=r...@mh-freiburg.de
    >>    5.
    [14]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=r...@mh-freiburg.de
    >>    6.
    [15]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=r...@mh-freiburg.de
    >>    7.
    >>

[16]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co
    .uk
    >>    8.

[17]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihuela@cs.dartmouth.e
    du
    >>    9.
    [18]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
    >>   10.
    [19]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
    >>   11.
    [20]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
    >>   12.
    [21]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
    >>   13.
    [22]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
    >>   14.
    >>

[23]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co
    .uk
    >>   15.

[24]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihuela@cs.dartmouth.e
    du
    >>   16.
    >>

[25]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co
    .uk
    >>   17.
    [26]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
    >>   18. [27]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
    >>   19.

[28]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de
    >>   20.
    [29]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
    >>   21.
    [30]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
    >>   22.
    [31]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
    >>   23.
    [32]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
    >>   24.
    >>

[33]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co
    .uk
    >>   25.

[34]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihuela@cs.dartmouth.e
    du
    >>   26.
    >>

[35]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co
    .uk
    >>   27.
    [36]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
    >>   28. [37]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
    >>   29.

[38]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de
    >>
    >
    >  --

References

    1. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
    2. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
    3. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
    4. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
    5. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
    6. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
    7. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
    8. mailto:eisenha...@planet.nl
    9. mailto:r...@mh-freiburg.de
10. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk 11. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   12. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
   13. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=r...@mh-freiburg.de
   14. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=r...@mh-freiburg.de
   15. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=r...@mh-freiburg.de
16. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk 17. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   18. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
   19. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
   20. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
   21. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
   22. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
23. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk 24. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu 25. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
   26. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
   27. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   28. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de
   29. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
   30. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
   31. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
   32. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
33. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk 34. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu 35. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
   36. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=eisen...@planet.nl
   37. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   38. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de





Reply via email to